Sen why and how is health a human right




















He also unpacked why countries are obligated to help their people be healthy, stay well-nourished and remain active in their communities. From a global health perspective, he teaches that health is a human right that comes to every individual by virtue of being human, not by being a citizen of one particular country. I am proud that DLSPH is one of few schools globally with an explicit focus on health as a human right, led by Lisa and many other leaders, including Professors Arjumand Siddiqi and Stephanie Nixon, who have produced exemplary work on the nexus of health, inequities, power and privilege.

Find in Worldcat. Go to page:. Your current browser may not support copying via this button. Search within book. Subscriber sign in You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Username Please enter your Username. Password Please enter your Password. There are political, social, economic, scientific, and cultural actions that we can take for advancing the cause of good health for all.

It includes the full spectrum of essential, quality health services, from health promotion to prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliative care. UHC enables everyone to access the services that address the most significant causes of disease and death, and ensures that the quality of those services is good enough to improve the health of the people who receive them.

Protecting people from the financial consequences of paying for health services out of their own pockets reduces the risk that people will be pushed into poverty because unexpected illness requires them to use up their life savings, sell assets, or borrow — destroying their futures and often those of their children.

It recognized the role of health in international development goals and called on all countries and organizations to include UHC in the international development agenda.

Oyedele, and B. Ayres et al. Beyrer and H. Pizer eds , Public Health and Human Rights. For example, the South African Human Rights Commission is empowered to hear and investigate complaints related to health and health care. One complaint about violations of the right to privacy of patients attending an abortion service at a large teaching hospital in Cape Town led, through the investigation, to remedial action in the form of further value clarification workshops for staff involved.

A second complaint following the death of an infant from diarrhoea at a rural hospital prompted an investigation that identified staffing organization as a contributory cause and led to restructuring of call arrangements to prevent future recurrence personal communication, Mr. The more famous case of Mr. Soobramoney involved a claim to the Constitutional Court based on the right to life and the right to emergency treatment for patients who required kidney dialysis.

Because his private health insurance had been depleted, he turned to the public health care system. Jurisprudence on this case remains an important national and global precedent for thinking about how to realize the right to health. Varkey and S. Crisp and A. Klugman and S.

Klugman, and D. Smart and A. Ntsaluba and Y. Swilling and B. Ballard, A. Habib, and I. Pearson and M. Ockene, E. Edgerton, S. Teutsch, L. Marion, T. Miller, J. Genevro, C. Loveland-Cherry, J. Fielding, and P. Suhrcke, M. McKee, and L. Gostin and J. Mann et al. Ibid : pp. Gilson, G. Khumalo, E. Erasmus, S. Mbatsha, and D. Available at www. Participation and Civic Engagement Paper No. Klugman and Varkey see note 61 ; S. Guttmacher, F. Kapadia, J. Naylor and M.

Schattan, P. Coelho, B. Pozzoni, and M. Gastil and P. Thomas and L. Introduction We live in an increasingly globalized environment, characterized by growing tensions between our technological capacities and the abilities of our social policies to meet basic health needs. For example, Udo Schuklenk and Anita Kleinsmidt, in considering improved provision and uptake of voluntary counseling and testing VCT as an alternative to mandatory HIV testing, argued that: it is not good public health policy, given resource constraints in countries with high HIV prevalence rates, to divert resources away from testing and treating people toward activities related to health promotion and counselling … preserving lives must take priority over counselling … whenever feasible, governments and other health care providers should consider mandatory testing and treatment regimes.

Why does it matter? Two areas merit exploration — that of health care and that of the determinants of health. Conclusion Unless we recognize 1 the programmatic and policy indivisibility of civil and political rights and socio-economic rights; 2 the critical importance of agency on the part of civil society in realizing rights; and 3 the complementarities and differences in ethical and human rights standards, particularly acute in the problems of dual loyalty faced by clinicians, providers, and policy-makers, we will make insufficient use of rights-based approaches to impact the health of the most vulnerable in society.

References 1. London , see note Heywood see note 26 ; London , see note 28 ; Marias see note Sen see note Rubenstein et al. Singh et al. London see note Stuttaford see note Marmot see note 4. London et al. Guttmacher et al. Previous Post Previous Previous Post.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000