The suspended load transport rate still assuming cohesionless sediment and a sediment size of 0. Other sediment rating curves have been developed, but they cannot be equally applied to all water bodies This is because in any application, there are seven main variables that have an effect on sediment transport rates 11, The sediment transport rate is a function of these seven variables, as well as the size-shape-density distribution often assumed as a standard deviation of the particle diameter of the suspended particles In addition, the largest river discharge does not automatically mean that a river will have the largest sediment load.
The quantity and material of the sediment particles, as well as the geography of the local terrain will still play a contributing role in the sediment load The sediment load itself is calculated as a depth-integrated sediment mass above a unit area It is variable for multiple reasons, but can be estimated with a time-average collected sediment concentration While it is dependent on flow to initiate and continue transport, it is not calculated from flow rates, as the main variables in sediment load come from environment factors.
Sediment transport relies on water flow to move a load downstream. Water flow is variable, affected not only by the local terrain e. Most changes in water level are due to weather events such as rainfall Precipitation causes water levels to initially rise, and then return to previous levels base flow over the course of hours or days. Rainfall, whether slight or heavy can affect water flow and sediment transport.
The extent to which a weather event will influence sediment transport is dependent on the amount of sediment available. Snowmelt in a glaciated area will result in a high sediment load due to glacial silt Heavy rainfall over an area of loose soil and minimal vegetation will create runoff, carrying loose particles into the waterway. Likewise, flooding will also pick up sediment from the local area. Increased water level creates additional volume in a channel, and increases the hydraulic radius cross-sectional area of a waterway.
The increased hydraulic radius increases the discharge rate, regardless of whether or not flow is uniform or non-uniform Increased flow will increase the stress on the bed, making it more likely for water flow to initiate sediment transport. The higher velocity also increases erosion rates as flow overcomes the shear stress of sediment Seasonal effects are also responsible for changes in water level and flow Most seasonal changes are due to precipitation levels and events such as snowmelt.
During low precipitation and low flow periods, sediment transport falls. During the peak of snowmelt, the sediment load can increase by a factor of 15 or more Climate change can also play a role in sediment transport, as it affects both the timing and magnitude of floods and other weather events Anthropogenic factors, such as dams and altered land use will affect both the sediment load and sediment transport rate Dams affect the water flow through complete detention or restricted channels A sediment-starved river will not be able to provide habitats for benthic organisms or spawning fish The highly silted reservoir behind the dam may face issues of too much sediment, including changes in aquatic life and the potential for algal blooms.
On the other side of the spectrum, when a dam release occurs, the flow rate downstream can dramatically increase. If the release is controlled, it can refresh the bed material, building bars and other habitat areas. An uncontrolled release or dam removal can result in flooding, carrying the released sediment further downstream than is needed Human land use, such as urban areas, agricultural farms and construction sites will affect the sediment load, but not the transport rate These effects are indirect, as they require heavy rainfall or flooding to carry their sediment into the waterway.
However, anthropogenic land use is one of the leading contributors to excessive sedimentation due to erosion and runoff This loose soil is then easily carried into a nearby river or stream by rainfall and runoff. While sediment is needed to build aquatic habitats and reintroduce nutrients for submerged vegetation, too much or too little sediment can easily cause ecosystem and safety issues.
Whether the concerns are caused by scour, erosion, build up, or simply excessive turbidity, the sediment transport rate is an important environmental factor In addition to the problems cause by load quantity, sediment can easily introduce pollution and other contaminants into a waterway, spreading the pollutants downstream Large sediment loads are the most common issue seen with sediment transport rates. Too much sediment can cause poor water quality, algal blooms, and deposition build-up.
For aquatic life, excessive suspended sediment can disrupt natural aquatic migrations, as well damage gills and other organs 8, Diminished water quality occurs with unusually high sediment transport rates. Turbidity can cause water temperatures to rise sediment absorbs more solar heat than water does 1. Rising water temperatures will cause dissolved oxygen levels to drop, as warm water cannot hold as much oxygen as cold water Suspended sediment can block sunlight from reaching submerged plants, decreasing photosynthesis rates and lowering dissolved oxygen levels still further If the increase in the sediment load is due to agricultural and urban runoff, algal blooms can occur from the increased nutrient load carried into the water body Regular sediment deposition can build bars for aquatic habitats, but increased sedimentation can destroy more habitats than it creates.
Siltation, the name for fine sediment deposition, occurs when water flow rates decrease dramatically. This fine sediment can then smother insect larvae, fish eggs and other benthic organisms as it settles out of the water column 1, Sediment deposition is responsible for creating alluvial fans and deltas, but excessive accumulation of sediment can build up channel plugs and levees.
These deposits then block the river from reaching other stream threads or floodplains Increased sedimentation is considered one of the primary causes of habitat degradation Depending on the local geology and terrain, sediment build-up can damage aquatic ecosystems not only in downstream sites, but in upstream headwaters as the deposits grow Sediment deposition is considered extreme when it exceeds the recommended or established total maximum daily load TMDL.
A TMDL establishes a limit for measurable pollutants and parameters for a body of water That means that TMDLs can be created for several different elements of the sediment load, including total suspended solids, nutrient impairment, pathogens and siltation When developing a TMDL report, it is important to consider whether or not the waterway itself is generating the sediment load naturally, as an unstable stream channel Though too much sediment is the more common concern, a lack of sediment transport will also cause environmental issues.
Sediment starvation is often caused by man-made structures such as dams, though natural barriers can also limit sediment transport 8. Without sediment transport and deposition, new habitats cannot be formed, and without some nutrient enrichment carried with sediment into the water , submerged vegetation could not grow 8.
Too little sediment can alter an ecosystem to the point that native species cannot survive. In addition to the effect on aquatic life, the loss of sediment transport and deposition can cause physical changes to the terrain. Downstream of dammed rivers, it is common to see receding riparian zones and wetlands due to the loss of transported sediment 8.
Erosion downstream of a barrier is common, as is coastline erosion when there is not a large enough sediment load currently carried by the water The flowing water will pick up new sediment from the bottom and banks of a waterway eroding instead of refreshing habitats as it attempts to adjust to a uniform flow rate Contaminated sediments are the accumulated riverbed materials that contain toxic or hazardous substances that are detrimental to aquatic, human or environmental health These contaminants often come from point-source pollution such as industrial wastewater or other effluent sources , though they can also enter the water through runoff over contaminated soils mine waste, landfills and urban areas , chemical spills, or deposits from air pollution As contaminants do not degrade or degrade very slowly , they can be a source of environmental issues for long periods of time, even if they are not frequently resuspended The most problematic contaminants in both bedded and suspended sediment are metals and persistent bioaccumulative toxics PBTs , such as pesticides and methyl mercury Sediment remediation may involve dredging to remove the contaminated sediment from the waterway When sediment transport removes material from a streambed or bank, the erosion process is called scour Scour can occur anywhere that there is water flow and erodible material.
Local scour is the engineering term for the isolated removal of sediment at one location, such as the base of underwater structures, including bridge piers and abutments This localized erosion can cause structural failure, as bridges and overwater constructions rely on the bed sediment to support them.
While scour can occur anywhere, it is more likely to occur in alluvial waterways erodible bed and banks , as opposed to a bedrock-based nonalluvial channel As water flow is responsible for conducting sediment transport, scour can occur even during low flow conditions. A 2,meter ice core from East Antarctica reveals , annual layers of accumulation, year-by-year, snow layer by snow layer. And those annual layers rest atop another 2, meters of ice, which sit on vastly older rocks.
The obvious conclusion is that at least a million years is needed to account for many surficial deposits of sediment and ice. Earth must be much older than that, but how old?
Ice cores from Antarctica and Greenland reveal hundreds of thousands of years of snow accumulation. First, how old is the big island of Hawaii? The massive Hawaiian Islands rose from the Pacific as volcanoes periodically added layers of lava Fig. From modern-day eruptions, we know that active volcanoes grow by perhaps a meter every century. The highest point on the big island of Hawaii is Mauna Kea at 4, meters above sea level.
However, the volcano rises approximately 10, meters above the ocean floor, so a rough calculation gives its age:. The Hawaiian Islands are a chain of volcanoes, each formed from layer after layer of lava. A new island dubbed Loihi is now forming south of the big island. This is a rough estimate, to be sure, but it jives well with other methods that date the big island of Hawaii as about a million years old.
The other islands that string out to the northwest, each with now-dormant volcanoes, are progressively older and a new island, dubbed Loihi, is already forming as volcanoes erupt on the ocean floor southeast of the big island. You can do a similar calculation to date the Atlantic Ocean, which is about 3, kilometers wide and grows wider every year.
These continents were once joined into the supercontinent Pangaea; the Atlantic Ocean formed when Pangaea split down the middle and formed a divergent boundary, now marked by the Mid-Atlantic Ridge Fig.
New crust forms along the Ridge, as Europe and Africa move away from the Americas. Exacting satellite measurements over the past two decades reveal an average spreading rate of 2. The Atlantic Ocean formed when the supercontinent Pangaea began to split apart about million years ago.
Source: USGS. This rough estimate of about million years is close to other measurements of the age of the Atlantic.
It is remarkable to imagine that a great ocean, a seemingly permanent feature of our home planet, is so transient in the context of Earth history. A third simple calculation reveals even longer time spans. The Appalachian Mountains are now gently rounded and relatively low—mostly below 3, meters high Fig. But geological evidence reveals that they once were the grandest mountain chain on Earth, rivaling the Himalayas in ruggedness and height with some peaks at more than 10, meters.
Ever so gradually, erosion has worn the Appalachians down to their present state, but how long might that process take? The gently rounded Appalachian Mountains a were once the tallest and most rugged mountain rage in the world, rivaling the modern Himalayas b.
Hundreds of millions of years of erosion were required to achieve their present appearance. The volume of this impressive mountain is thus:.
Now, imagine a stream that flows down the side of this mountain. Mountain streams carry silt and sand downwards—a key factor in erosion.
All of these sediments came from higher up the mountain, which is constantly being eroded away. To estimate how long a mountain might survive against erosion, consider a mountain with six principal streams. A typical stream might carry an average of one-tenth of a cubic meter of rock and soil a few shovels full per day off the mountain, though the actual amount would vary considerably from day to day. Over a period of a year, the six streams might thus remove:. That means every year on the order of cubic meters of material, or about 20 dump trucks full of rock and soil, might be removed from a mountain by normal stream erosion.
If the mountain streams remove about cubic meters per year, then the lifetime of the mountain can be estimated as the total volume of the mountain divided by the volume lost each year:. This estimate is certainly rough and not directly applicable to any specific mountain. Nevertheless, a few hundred million years is but a small fraction of a few billion years. How can we say Earth is 4. The physical process of radioactive decay has provided Earth scientists, anthropologists, and evolutionary biologists with their most important method for determining the absolute age of rocks and other materials Dalrymple ; Dickin Trace amounts of isotopes of radioactive elements, including carbon, uranium, and dozens of others, are all around us—in rocks, in water, and in the air Table 1.
The rest of the uranium will have decayed to , atoms of other elements, ultimately to stable i. Wait another 4.
Radiometric dating relies on the clock-like characteristics of radioactive decay. In one half-life, approximately half of a collection of radioactive atoms will decay. Source: NCSE. The best-known radiometric dating method involves the isotope carbon, with a half life of 5, years. Every living organism takes in carbon during its lifetime.
At this moment, your body is taking the carbon in your food and converting it to tissue, and the same is true of all other animals. Plants are taking in carbon dioxide from the air and turning it into roots, stems, and leaves. But a certain small percentage of the carbon in your body and every other living thing—no more than one carbon atom in every trillion—is in the form of radioactive carbon As long as an organism is alive, the carbon in its tissues is constantly renewed in the same small, part-per-trillion proportion that is found in the general environment.
All of the isotopes of carbon behave the same way chemically, so the proportions of carbon isotopes in the living tissue will be nearly the same everywhere, for all living things. When an organism dies, however, it stops taking in carbon of any form. From the time of death, therefore, the carbon in the tissues is no longer replenished. Like a ticking clock, carbon atoms transmute by radioactive decay to nitrogen, atom-by-atom, to form an ever-smaller percentage of the total carbon.
Scientists can thus determine the approximate age of a piece of wood, hair, bone, or other object by carefully measuring the fraction of carbon that remains and comparing it to the amount of carbon that we assume was in that material when it was alive.
If the material happens to be a piece of wood taken out of an Egyptian tomb, for example, we have a pretty good estimate of how old the artifact is and, by inference, when the tomb was built. The result: the two independent techniques yield exactly the same dates for ancient fossil wood. Carbon dating often appears in the news in reports of ancient human artifacts. In a highly publicized discovery in , an ancient hunter was found frozen in the ice pack of the Italian Alps Fig.
The technique provided similar age determinations for the tissues of the iceman, his clothing, and his implements Fowler Carbon dating revealed that he died about 5, years ago. Photo courtesy South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology, www. Carbon dating has been instrumental in mapping human history over the last several tens of thousands of years. When an object is more than about 50, years old, however, the amount of carbon left in it is so small that this dating method cannot be used.
To date rocks and minerals that are millions of years old, scientists must rely on similar techniques that use radioactive isotopes of much greater half-life Table 1.
Among the most widely used radiometric clocks in geology are those based on the decay of potassium half-life of 1.
In these cases, geologists measure the total number of atoms of the radioactive parent and stable daughter elements to determine how many radioactive nuclei were present at the beginning. Thus, for example, if a rock originally formed a long time ago with a small amount of uranium atoms but no lead atoms, then the ratio of uranium-to-lead atoms today can provide an accurate geologic stop watch.
When you see geologic age estimates reported in scientific publications or in the news, chances are those values are derived from radiometric dating techniques. In the case of the early settlement of North America, for example, carbon-rich campfire remains and associated artifacts point to a human presence by about 13, years ago.
Much older events in the history of life, some stretching back billions of years, are often based on potassium dating. This technique works well because fossils are almost always preserved in layers of sediments, which also record periodic volcanic ash falls as thin horizons. Volcanic ash is rich in potassium-bearing minerals, so each ash fall provides a unique time marker in a sedimentary sequence.
Similar things may be said of volcanic eruptions, of rivers flooding, of earthquakes, and of pretty much anything else. Now this presents us with a difficulty. If we look at the rates of erosion and deposition as they are happening now, we may be discounting the largest events.
In principle it might be possible for example that much or even most of the erosion forming a wave-cut platform is performed by thousand-year storms of a magnitude that we have never actually observed on that stretch of coast. Similarly, much or most of a volcanic cone might have been formed by eruptions of a magnitude that that particular volcano only ever undergoes every hundred thousand years.
Then again, when we look at erosion or sedimentary deposition, we must also consider long-term alterations in climate. A river, for example, eroding its banks and depositing sediment at its mouth may be a mere trickle in a cold dry climate when compared to its rate of flow in a hot moist climate; and as we shall see in the articles on paleoclimatology , climates have indeed undergone long-term variations such as these.
In some cases, deposition may have stopped altogether for a time, forming a paraconformity ; and if the paraconformity is brief enough not to cause a significant discontinuity in the faunal succession, we might never know about it; and if there are enough such paraconformities, then we could be missing sizable chunks of time when we measure the thickness of sediment and try to estimate its age. Note that the problems we have been discussing do not all operate in the same direction: some would cause us to overestimate durations, and some to underestimate them.
And one more problem: suppose we wanted to use these techniques to find the age of a fossil in for example the Tonto Group, which lies near the base of the Grand Canyon. Naively, we might try looking at the layers of sediment lying above it, estimating how long it took the limestone , sandstone , shale , etc.
The trouble is that the rocks contain a number of unconformities between the bottom and the top, and the top itself, the Colorado Plateau, is also an eroded surface. Each of these surfaces represents vanished sediment which took a certain amount of time to be deposited which we cannot even estimate, because we don't know how much sediment there was; and which took a certain amount of time to be eroded which we also can't estimate for exactly the same reason.
So even if we managed to overcome all the other problems we have mentioned and produce good ball-park estimates for the length of time it took to produce each rock formation, we would be unable to put a date on the lowest rocks and the fossils they contained.
0コメント